Location: 20th at Guerrero, San Francisco, CA 94110 Contact: Chuck Totah ~ 650-440-6445 ~ ct@jwavro.com
|
Friday, March 16, 2012
Justed Listed - SF Noe/Mission Flat
Just Listed - South City Lights Condo
Location: Gellert at Marbella, South San Francisco, CA 94080 Contact: Chuck Totah ~ 650-440-6445 ~ ct@jwavro.com
|
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Google Browsing History Tracking Policy
How to delete your Google Browsing History before new policy
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/320137#ixzz1noe124uO
1 more article on this subject:
12 hours ago - Google's new privacy policy under investigation in Europe - 3 comments
With just a week to go before Google changes to its new privacy policy that allows it to gather, store and use personal information, users have a last chance to delete their Google Browsing History, along with any damning information therein.
Tech News Daily reports that once Google's new unified privacy policy takes effect all data already collected about you, including search queries, sites visited, age, gender and location will be gathered and assigned to your online identity represented by your Gmail and YouTube accounts. After the policy takes effect you are not allowed to opt out without abandoning Google altogether. But now before the policy takes effect, you have the option of deleting your Google Web History by modifying your settings so that Google is unable to associate data collected about you with your Gmail or YouTube accounts.
Tech News Daily reports that Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) , a nonprofit organization based in San Francisco that advocates for online privacy, says: "Search data can reveal particularly sensitive information about you, including facts about your location, interests, age, sexual orientation, religion, health concerns, and more."
EFF advises all Google users to delete their web history.
Meanwhile, Center for Digital Democracy has filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, asking the Commission to sue Google to stop the policy change. Tech News Daily reports FTC can impose fines up to $16,000 per day for violation.
Daily Mail reports that deleting your browsing history before March 1 when Google's new privacy policy comes into effect will limit Google's ability to track and record your every move online. The process is simple. Follow the steps below:
1. Go to the google homepage and sign into your account.
2. Click the dropdown menu next to your name in the upper-right hand corner of your screen.
3. Click accounts settings
4. Find the "Services section"
5. Under "Services" there is a sub-section that reads "View, enable, disable web history." Click the link next to it that reads: "Go to Web History."
6. Click on "Remove all Web History"
When you click on "Remove all Web History," a message appears that says " Web History is Paused." What this means is that while Google will continue gathering and storing information about your web history it will make all data anonymous, that is, Google will not associate your Web History information with your online accounts and will therefore be unable to send you customized search results.
Google's ability to gather personalized information about you by assigning data to your Gmail and YouTube accounts will remain "Paused" till you click "Resume."
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/320137#ixzz1noe124uO
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Just Listed: $3,900 Executive Home 3bed + Loft & Bay Views
Location: Pointe View at Mandalay Pl., South San Francisco, CA 94080 Contact: Chuck Totah ~ 650-440-6445 ~ ct@jwavro.com
|
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Who Does Rent Control Really Help?
How Rent Control Subsidizes San Francisco's Super-Rich
A law meant to help the poor and working class will benefit the latest tech boom's new millionaires
By SCOTT JAMES on February 16, 2012 - 6:01 p.m. PST
Thousands of people are expected to become rich in the latest Bay Area tech boom, and in San Francisco these newly minted millionaires will receive a benefit originally meant to help the poor and working class: rent control.
Not that they have a choice. The law applies to rental apartments built before June 1979, regardless of the tenant’s income. Rent increases are limited to less than inflation — last year the increase was 0.1 percent, an all-time low.
But with an estimated 30 percent of the city’s rental properties owned by mom-and-pop investors with four units or less, an unintended consequence of rent control is becoming more prevalent: people of relatively modest means subsidizing the housing of the extraordinarily wealthy.
Critics say it is just the latest failure of the city’s housing policies.
Noni Richen, a former school cafeteria cook, and her husband, who once worked on the Alaskan pipeline, put their life savings into buying a four-unit Western Addition apartment building in the 1980s. “We had $20,000,” Richen said. “That was a lot of money to us, and we put that down.”
The rents the Richens collect have changed little since then because of rent control: $1,000 for each two-bedroom apartment. “It’s a deal,” she said, noting that her tenants aren’t wealthy but that her expenses (insurance, repairs, utilities) have risen faster than the rents. “I don’t begrudge them. I’d do the same thing if I was them.”
RELATED
But what Richen sees as a basic question of fairness has prompted her to become an outspoken critic of rent control, serving on the board of the Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute , a volunteer organization that advocates for small-time landlords.
Henry Karnilowicz, the group’s president, said rent control should be abolished, or at least reformed so that the wealthy do not receive subsidized rent. “There should be means testing,” he said.
Karnilowicz estimated that 5 percent of the city’s 212,000 rental units (about 10,600) are kept vacant by landlords who would rather not deal with rent control (others estimate the number is higher, about 25,000 units). He said that many owners would rent those homes if there were reforms, like requiring the rich to pay full market value.
Such a move is highly unlikely, however. In a city where 64 percent of residents rent, tenants have enormous political clout and it is unpopular to even discuss reforming rent control.
The cone of silence was evident Monday when a parade of economists and housing experts testified at a board of supervisors committee meeting about the city’s housing situation. Each presentation showed that housing had become increasingly unaffordable in recent years, pricing out people at every income level — except the wealthy.
Yet not one expert mentioned rent control’s impact on the market.
Voters approved rent control in 1979 to help preserve communities by limiting rent increases, a threat to working class and lower-income tenants. However, a new city analysis shows that for the first time upper-income households (annual incomes over $107,000) outnumber the poor (incomes under $35,000), 29 percent to 27 percent. And rents for vacancies average $2,600 a month, a record high.
According to Ted Gullicksen, executive director of the San Francisco Tenants Union, the market is much like it was during the 1990s dot-com boom that pushed rents and displacements to extremes.
Additionally, the number of existing rent-controlled apartments has been reduced by demolition or conversion to sale as private homes, like condominiums. “There’s a serious and steady depletion of housing rental stock,” Gullicksen said, perhaps 1,000 or more units annually.
Protecting that dwindling supply from further erosion has become a “ferocious” battle, said Sara Shortt, executive director of the Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco, a tenants’ advocacy group.
But just trying to determine the exact number of rent-controlled units — and their tenants’ finances — is difficult. The city’s last comprehensive research, undertaken in 2000, found that one-fourth of households in rent-controlled apartments earned more than $100,000 a year — a revelation that prompted I-told-you-so rhetoric from some landlords.
Since then, similar comprehensive research has been blocked, in part by tenants’ advocates who believe the findings would be “politicized” and become a referendum on rent control, Shortt said.
Both she and Gullicksen oppose means testing to exclude the rich from rent control. There are privacy concerns, they said, and it would create a situation in which landlords would then rent only to the wealthy.
And with so many tech nouveau riche around, that could make matters even worse for those of ordinary means.
This article also appears in the Bay Area edition of The New York Times.
Monday, February 13, 2012
Top Floor San Mateo 2 bedroom
Just Listed for Rent - J.Wavro - Chuck Totah - Top Floor San Mateo 2 bedroom Rental
Chuck Totah ~ 650-440-6445 ~ ct@jwavro.com
| | | ||||||||||
» Click image to enlarge « » Scroll down for more photos « |
Content and Images © 2012 J.Wavro Associates 5400 | www.jwavro.com --- CA DRE # 01810008 |
Executive Emeralds Hills Estate
Just Listed for Rent - J.Wavro - Chuck Totah - Executive Emerald Hills Estate
$11,750 Executive Emeralds Hills Estate
Chuck Totah ~ 650-440-6445 ~ ct@jwavro.com
| | | ||||||||||
» Click image to enlarge « » Scroll down for more photos « |
Luxury
6600+ sf. Emerald Hills Home located in the Parkwood Estates gated
community. Newer construction home with high end finishes, situated in a
serene and private setting at the end of a cul-de-sac overlooking
county reserve with canyon views. Award winning Roy Cloud elementary
and Woodside High school districts. Features Include: - 5 bedrooms and 4 1/2 baths Main Home - 1 bedroom/1bath Guest House - Separate Office - Fully Equipped Gym - Lushly landscaped yard with Pool, Spa, & Court - 3-car garage For Questions and Showings Call Chuck (650)440-6445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location - Colton Court at Colton Ct. , Redwood City, CA 94062 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rent: | $11,750 | Utils. Included: | None | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bed / Bath: | 6/5 | Lease Term: | 1 Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unit Type: | House | Kitchen Type: | Gourmet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pets: | Negotiable | Stove: | None | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
View: | Backyard | Flooring: | Hardwood & Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outside Area: | Yard | Fireplace: | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Window Coverings: | Drapes | Laundry: | In Unit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parking: | Garage | Parking Fee: | Included | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unit Amenities: | None | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chuck Totah ~ 650-440-6445 ~ Call for an appointment or email ct@jwavro.com if emailing, please copy the following into the subject line: Interested in Executive Emeralds Hills Estate, 6851--4165
Please consider the environment before printing the entire listing, all pertinent information is found on page 1
|
Content and Images © 2012 J.Wavro Associates 6851 | www.jwavro.com --- CA DRE # 01810008 |
Labels:
Burlingame,
Los Altos,
luxury executive homes condos lofts and apartments for rent,
Menlo Park,
Millbrae,
Palo Alto,
Peninsula,
rental houses,
San Francisco,
San Mateo
Location:
Colton Ct, Redwood City, CA 94062, USA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)